Landmaark La Palladium
Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
·
By Property Select
5-step Verified · audited 42d ago
₹ 6.5 Cr onwards
₹ 6.5 Cr
Size range
1,739 sqft
Possession
2029
Amenities at Landmaark La Palladium
Sports & Recreation
- Gym
- Kids Play Area
- Swimming Pool
Convenience
- Lift
Open Spaces
- Indoor Games
Why this project earned the Verified badge
5-step verification — verified 2026-09-08
Every step was independently audited by the Property Select compliance team. The verification log is public and re-validated every 90 days.
Developer history check [auto-passed on approve; reverted by v50 — never independently audited]
Land title audit [auto-passed on approve; reverted by v50 — never independently audited]
Zoning & land type [auto-passed on approve; reverted by v50 — never independently audited]
Regulatory compliance [auto-passed on approve; reverted by v50 — never independently audited]
Market feasibility [auto-passed on approve; reverted by v50 — never independently audited]
Project specifics
Asset classApartments
Configuration4.5 BHK- Carpet: 1,450 Sq.Ft. Built-up: 1,720 Sq.Ft. 4 Bedrooms + Study 4 Bathrooms Hall Kitchen Servant Quarte
Total area1,739 sqft
Possession2029
RegionIndia
About this project
—
ROI scenarios
Appreciation-focused
+0%
5-year est. capital gain
Income-focused
0.0%
Estimated rental yield
Hybrid
+0%
5-yr blended return
End-to-end services included
Legal
Included
Possession
Included
Utility setup
From ₹6,000
Leasing
15% take-rate
Exit
1.5% success
Comparable projects nearby
| Project | Size | Price from | 5-yr CAGR | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landmaark Life Style | — | — | +0% | Verified |
| Landmaark La Palacio | — | — | +0% | Verified |
| Landmaark Life Republic | — | — | +0% | Verified |
| Landmaark La Palladium (this project) | 1,739 sqft | ₹ 6.5 Cr | +0% | Verified |
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review.
Sign in to leave a review.
Questions & answers
No questions yet. Ask the developer anything.
Explore more in Navi Mumbai
Same builder · Property Select
Looking to rent instead?